Calculator
Build the right thing. Get it into production sooner.
Give teams the context and requirements to build work that is ready for review. Recover time lost to repeated questions and corrections, and shorten the path from a business idea to something the organization can use.
Explore the value for your team
Less time going back. More time moving forward.
Estimate how many hours each person could save every week by finding context faster, avoiding repeated questions, and getting the implementation right earlier. These are editable planning assumptions, not measured customer results.
Count hours of work saved, not days waiting in a queue. If someone covers several roles, allocate them to one role or split their hours so their time is counted once. Set unused roles to zero.
Adjust for your rollout
Full adoption includes everyone you entered. Lower adoption to reflect how many people will use the platform on average during a gradual rollout.
Potential annual capacity
22,560hours
Time your team could put into applications, architecture, and improvements instead of repeated handoffs.
- Application developers
- 9,600 h
- Cloud and platform engineers
- 9,600 h
- Architects
- 960 h
- Security and governance teams
- 2,400 h
Value of that capacity
$2,688,000
Per year, before product and operating costs. USD.
Recovered capacity is time for other work, not automatic payroll savings. Validate these assumptions against a real workflow during a pilot.
Your inputs stay in this page. The download includes your assumptions and the calculation.
And that is just the time your teams could recover.
Building an equivalent platform, keeping it running, and carrying the risk while you wait are separate costs. See what the internal-build decision includes below.
Explore the broader costsHow the estimate works
For each role, recovered hours equal people × hours saved per week × working weeks × average adoption. Multiply by that role’s loaded hourly cost and sum the results.
This model does not price passive waiting, avoided fines, internal platform development, or revenue from earlier delivery. Those are separate considerations below. Do not add audit or remediation hours again if they are already included here.
Beyond recovered hours
What would it cost to build and run an equivalent platform yourself?
This is a product engineering commitment. Your team would need to build the developer experience, agent workflows, cloud and repository integrations, architecture context, rules lifecycle, verification, identity, access controls, and audit evidence. Then it would need to operate, support, secure, and evolve that platform.
Building an equivalent enterprise platform
$4.5 million to $7.5 million
Illustrative replacement engineering cost
Account for a complete platform that regulated teams can depend on, including architecture, implementation, integrations, testing, security, and delivery workflows. Buying makes an existing product available while your team focuses on adoption and integration.
See the assumptions
30,000 engineering hours × $150 to $250 per hour. The hours are an illustrative replacement-effort assumption informed by our development experience, not a measured estimate for your organization.
This is a planning scenario, not audited Infracodebase development spend or a fixed-price build quote. Scope, staffing, and existing internal capabilities will change the cost. Hosting, model usage, and ongoing operations are separate.
Operating and evolving that platform
$1 million to $3 million
Illustrative annual product-team cost
Maintain integrations, track cloud and model changes, evolve verification and governance, handle vulnerabilities, support users, and keep the service reliable. The internal product still needs a team after launch.
See the assumptions
5 to 10 dedicated staff × $200,000 to $300,000 in annual fully loaded cost per person. The lower endpoint uses 5 × $200,000; the upper uses 10 × $300,000.
An assumed mix of product engineering, reliability, security, and support capacity. Infrastructure and model bills are additional. This is not the cost of maintaining a single integration.
Security and regulatory exposure
$6.3 million
Average financial-services breach cost, IBM 2026
The consequences of a serious control failure extend well beyond remediation hours. Incident response, disruption, lost business, and regulatory exposure belong in the decision alongside engineering costs.
See the source and scope
IBM’s 2026 Cost of a Data Breach research reports an average of $6.3 million for financial-services breaches. This is an external benchmark, not a staffing estimate.
Total breach cost is not the same as a regulatory fine. This benchmark is not specific to cloud misconfigurations and does not imply that Infracodebase prevents every breach or saves this amount. It is not added to the calculator.
Read IBM’s 2026 findingsPreparing for review and audit
$36,000 to $120,000
Illustrative annual evidence preparation effort
Teams spend time reconstructing decisions, demonstrating controls, and answering follow-up questions. Evidence alongside the code gives reviewers a better starting point.
See the assumptions
3 specialists × 40 to 80 hours per review cycle × 2 cycles per year × $150 to $250 per hour.
Internal preparation only. Excludes auditor fees and the wider compliance program. Remove any overlap with the governance hours you entered above before combining estimates.
Losing the opportunity while you wait
$96,000 to $480,000
Illustrative team capacity tied up during a delay
While a project waits, budgets can grow, funding can disappear, and leadership can reset priorities. Delivering sooner gives the business a better chance to realize the opportunity while it still exists.
See the assumptions
4 people kept on the project × 4 to 12 extra weeks × 40 hours per week × $150 to $250 per hour.
Applies only while the team remains allocated. This is committed capacity, not necessarily additional payroll or lost revenue. The value of a canceled initiative or missed market opportunity is separate.
Build, maintenance, audit, and delay figures are transparent planning scenarios for an enterprise comparison, not industry averages or guaranteed savings. Their rates and staffing assumptions are separate from the editable calculator. The breach figure is a sourced external benchmark. These costs have different time periods and can overlap, so they are not combined into one total.
Start with one workflow
Select a repeatable request, such as provisioning an application environment or remediating a class of security findings. Record today's effort, waiting time, and review outcomes. Compare equivalent work during a pilot while keeping the same approval requirements.
Measure the change
Time to approved change
Elapsed time from a complete request to approval, including waiting and rework.
Can the business start delivering its use case sooner?
Specialist effort
Engineering hours spent on routine implementation, clarification, review, and corrections.
Is the platform team gaining capacity for higher value work?
Review quality
First-review acceptance and findings that require another implementation cycle.
Are standards reaching the work early enough?
Self-service adoption
Eligible requests completed using approved patterns, with the required review.
Can more teams use platform capabilities without a specialist doing every step?
Use the evidence you have
Our customer stories describe the work underway and its goals. For your business case, agree on a baseline and success measures with your engineering, security, and finance teams.
Start with a real infrastructure challenge.
Bring a workflow, an existing stack, or a new cloud project. We can walk through where Infracodebase fits and what your team would review.